Comparison of the key management and leadership aspects of organisations in the private sector, public sector and not for profit sector Free Essay Example, 2000 words

Managers should also consider various needs of individuals when influencing people because employees are different. In organizational conflict and change, behavioral approach remains to be practical. It addresses the inevitability of conflict and proposes that conflicting individuals should be understood. Furthermore, it acknowledges that individual often resist change on social aspects. Workers are often organised into teams in the behavioural approach. This is because managers in most organisations are biased to a flatter organisational structure. Application of behavioural approach to management began in 1930’s as a reflection of Hawthorne’s expression of human relation movement and organisational behaviour development. The field of organisational behavior was developed to fill the gap left by early human relation experts who concentrated on inter-personal relations and gave little attention to the patterns of group behavior. As compared to human relations approach management, behavioral approach concentrates it efforts in the study of human behavior. Douglas, McGregor, Chester Barnard, Rensis Likert, Chris Argyris, Fredrick Hersberg, Warren G. Bennis, Mary Parker Follet, Abraham Maslow, and Robert Tannenbaum are some of the most distinguished human behaviour experts (scientists) who have contributed immensely to development of behavioral approach to management (Drucker, 1947). We will write a custom essay sample on Comparison of the key management and leadership aspects of organisations in the private sector, public sector and not for profit sector or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Human behaviour experts focused mainly on leadership, communication, motivation, organisational change and organisational conflicts. The research findings obtained by the human behaviour gurus have boosted the understanding of the organizational behavior. Human behaviour experts do not subscribe to the classical organizational structures. This is because the classical organizational structure applies traditional concept considered inappropriate at this age. The traditional concepts include narrow hierarchical authority, unity of command, relationships between line and staff, and narrow span of control. This hampers effective management. The classical organizational structures give managers room to dominate the work place unnecessarily. Consequently, subordinates become inactive and dependant on the managers. Behaviorists suggested that organizations should have flexible structures and that employee’s aptitude and potentials should determine t he jobs. Behavioral approach suggests that to measure and evaluate the performance standards of employees, relevant employees should be involved.